Cases 1 - 10 of 25,845
United States of America v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew Cole
Garnishee:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2024cv02415
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charlotte Creasy
Garnishee:
The City of Memphis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
United States of America v. LeMoyne-Owen College et al
as 2:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mechell D. Toles
Garnishee:
LeMoyne-Owen College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Moore v. Komatsu America Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
Darrin Moore
Defendant:
Komatsu America Corp. and Amber Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
United States of America v. Youth Villages et al
as 2:2024cv02411
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Smith, IV
Garnishee:
Youth Villages
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Kiner v. Shelby County Health Department et al
as 2:2024cv02412
Plaintiff:
Gerald Kiner
Defendant:
Shelby County Health Department and Travis Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Liu v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02413
Plaintiff:
Xiang Liu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and Lynuel Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emory v. Watwood
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Emory
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
