Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. The Attorney General of State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01089
Petitioner:
Bryan D. Williams
Defendant:
The Attorney General of State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Williams
as 1:2019cv01019
Defendant:
Mitzi D Williams
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Williams v. Nike, Inc.
as 2:2018cv02879
Plaintiff:
Kurtis D. Williams
Defendant:
Nike, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Board of Forensic Document Examiners et al v. American Bar Association et al
as 2:2016cv02641
Plaintiff:
Board of Forensic Document Examiners , M Patricia Fisher , Lynda Hartwick and others
Defendant:
American Bar Association , The Judges' Journal and Thomas Vastrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King et al v. Commissioner Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2015cv01303
Plaintiff:
Sharmaine King and Chastity Parham
Defendant:
Commissioner Department of Human Services, State of Tennessee Governor, Deborah Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv02545
Petitioner:
Tony D. Williams
Respondent:
D.R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv02402
Appellant:
Nelson D Williams
Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Williams et al v. Rudin
as 1:2011cv01103
Plaintiff:
Joe D. Williams and Sandra L. Williams
Defendant:
Andrew S. Rudin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv01072
Plaintiff:
Penny D Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, United States Attorney and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
