Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Perry v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office, Debbie Nichols, Bill Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. City of Germantown et al
as 2:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
Tamika Jones
Defendant:
City of Germantown, Robert M Brannon, Kevin Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Prosecutor et al
as 2:2018cv02742
Petitioner:
Frederick Shovell Rodgers
Respondent:
Public Defender, Judge Cambell and Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv02538
Petitioner:
LV Davis
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Oldham, Amy P. Weirich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duckiett v. Memphis City Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv02682
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Duckiett
Defendant:
Memphis City Police Department, State of Tennessee, Amy Weirich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Brock et al
as 2:2012cv02849
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Simpson
Defendant:
J. Brock, M. Biggs, Johnny Kumpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2011cv02885
Plaintiff:
Edward Brown
Defendant:
Shelby County, City of Memphis, TN, William L. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townes v. Alston et al
as 2:2009cv02643
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Townes
Defendant:
J. Mark Alston and State of Tennessee Division #5 Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2007cv02348
Plaintiff:
Ray Clifton Taylor
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Prosecutors and/or Attorney General Office and Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
