Cases 111 - 120 of 4,786
Davis et al v. Murphy et al
as 9:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Katarina Renee Kerr Davis and Darrel Wayne Kerr
Defendant:
Sydney Murphy and Norma Sue Gaston Coward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Heath v. Horton et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Billy . Horton, Kaleh Adams and Kentrell Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Webster et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Quinton Webster, Titus Webster and Rodney Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Snead v. City of Kountze, Texas
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Philip Snead
Defendant:
City of Kountze, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winston v. Croy, et al.
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Nadia Winston
Defendant:
Courtney Croy, Shannon Ebarb, Melanie Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hill v. East Texas ALF Reunion Inn, LLC dba Reunion Inn Assisted Living
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kytha Hill
Defendant:
East Texas ALF Reunion Inn, LLC dba Reunion Inn Assisted Living
Other:
William Joseph Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
