Cases 81 - 90 of 605
Texas Bank and Trust v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Texas Bank and Trust
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Diamond et al v. Keaton et al
as 6:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Kathryn H Diamond and Michael B. Harvey
Defendant:
Frances L Keaton and Gary E Keaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00050
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BingLi Lin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
BingLi Lin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
BingLi Lin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
BingLi Lin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sparrow et al v. EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Chrysa Sparrow and Kevin Sparrow
Defendant:
EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC, EasyKnock, Inc and LendingOne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Gatson v. Wilshire Commercial Capital L.L.C. et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Rodney Gatson
Defendant:
Wilshire Commercial Capital L.L.C. doing business as Westlake Financial Services, AutoNation Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram North Richland Hills and Quality Recovery Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Ping An Fund I, L.P. v. Ping An Financial Services, PTE, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Ping An Fund I, L.P.
Defendant:
Ping An Financial Services, PTE, LLC, Frank Smith, Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Conley v. BMI et al
as 4:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Sterling Conley
Defendant:
BMI, Rounders Records, Welk Music and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
