Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Robelle v. Sams Club
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Hailu K Robelle
Defendant:
Sams Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Confessore v. Hood et al
as 1:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Joseph Confessore
Defendant:
Robbie Hood, Kristina Smith, Rod Carroll and others
Consolidated Defendant:
John Kimbrough, K. C. Breshears, Ronnie Bennet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Confessore v. Kimbrough et al
as 1:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Joseph Confessore
Defendant:
John Kimbrough, K. C. Breshears, Ronnie Bennet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination under A.D.A.
Davis v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Ronald K Davis
Defendant:
John D Brown, James Singletary and The City of Beaumont, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thrasher v. Ft. Worth Tx. Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00350
Plaintiff:
Brandon K. Thrasher
Defendant:
Ft. Worth Tx. Police Department, Denton County Sheriff's Office and Department and Northlake Texas Police Department
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
