Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Foley et al v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services et al
as 1:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Holly M Foley and Vincent D Foley, Sr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family & Protective Services and Kali Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 5:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ann M Johnson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Jack et al v. Denton State Supportive Living Center et al
as 4:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Adolf Jack and Anita Jack
Defendant:
Denton State Supportive Living Center and Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cedillos, Jr. et al v. United States District Court Eastern District of Texas et al
as 4:2011cv00283
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Cedillos, Jr. and Gloria Parirenyatwa
Defendant:
United States District Court Eastern District of Texas, United States District Court Western District of Texas, Internal Revenue Service CID Division Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
