Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Richards v. Cannon et al
as 5:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Richards
Defendant:
Charles Cannon, Jason Pearce, FNU Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Texas v. Williford
as 1:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Jonathan Williford
Counter_claimant:
Jonathan Williford
Counter_defendant:
State of Texas
Thirdparty_defendant:
Hardin County Municipal Corporation
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Jonathan Williford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charboneau v. Davis et al
as 4:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Janine Charboneau
Defendant:
Danny Davis, Russell Driver, James Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsay v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Courtland Dewayne Lindsay
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Tyler and Tyler City Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsay v. Trans-Canada et al
as 6:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Courtland Dewayne Lindsay
Defendant:
Trans-Canada, LaGloria Inc, Union Pacific and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Walker et al
as 1:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
Stella Morrison
Defendant:
Layne Walker , Jefferson County, Texas and State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ratcliff v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee et al
as 9:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Elijah W Ratcliff
Defendant:
Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar Of Texas, State Of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Paselk v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
State Of Texas and Yvonne King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Paselk v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
State of Texas, Hopkins County Texas, Hopkins County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
