Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bradford et al v. City of Tatum, Texas et al
as 6:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Adam Chase Bradford, Paloma Bradford, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
City of Tatum, Texas, Parker Sweeney, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. Wright et al
as 6:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael E Williams
Defendant:
Yvonne Wright, Wright Way Property Management, Holly Creek Village Home Owners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Abbott et al
as 6:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
Linda Gail Jones
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Wood County, Texas, Wood County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantue et al v. Beaumont Independent School District
as 1:2013cv00728
Defendant:
Beaumont Independent School District
Plaintiff:
Gary Cantue , Oveal Walker, III , Macarthur English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Hudgens v. Marek et al
as 9:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
George T Hudgens
Defendant:
Patrick Marek, Eva Lee Bell, Billy S Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Doe
as 6:2010cv09000
Plaintiff:
Alice Doe
Defendant:
John Dr Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Drake v. St Paul Travelers Insurance et al
as 6:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
St Paul Travelers Insurance, Byrne, Mead & Smitherman Law Firm, Liberty Mutual Automotive Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
