Cases 31 - 40 of 210
Adams v. Robinson et al
as 6:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Sergeant Unknown Robinson, Officer Unknown Naaman, Officer Unknown Sergent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutright v. Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Gary Daivon Cutright
Defendant:
M. Allen, O. C. Martin, R. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Green v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green and Lowell Dequincy Green
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Matt Johnson, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Gracia et al
as 6:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Warden Gracia, Property Officer Caldwell Unknown, Commissary Staff Robb Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Gracia et al
as 6:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Warden Gracia, Bobby Lumpkin, Sgt Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Unknown Gracia, Warden Unknown Delapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Danheim et al
as 1:2021cv00594
Plaintiff:
Martin Alvarez, Jr
Defendant:
James Danheim, Fnu Alexander, FNU Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 6:2021cv00461
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2021cv00937
Petitioner:
Adam Rene Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
