Cases 31 - 40 of 650
Glass v. Upshur County Jail Medical et al
as 2:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
Upshur County Jail Medical, M.D. Bullard, Nurse R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, III v. Muniz
as 9:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Shay et al
as 6:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Clarence Moore
Defendant:
Brennan Shay, Brandon L Brewer, Justin R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Stephens
as 1:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Stephens
as 9:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Antonio Jones
Respondent:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Ames et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brunzswick LaKeith Jones
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Ames, Sheriff Botie Hillhouse, Chief FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Coffin et al
as 1:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ortiz
Defendant:
Warden Coffin, Donna Russell, D Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones, III v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00179
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones, III v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
