Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Bustos-Cruz v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00378
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Sergio Antonio Bustos-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mallard v. Womack et al
as 9:2024cv00138
Defendant:
FNU Night, FNU Baker, FNU Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mallard v. Womack et al
as 6:2024cv00269
Defendant:
Spangler Proper, Lewis Mason, Justin Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. USA
as 4:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Ivan Dejesus Suastes Cruz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Kline v. Cass County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Kline
Defendant:
Cass County Detention Center, Linden Police Department, Jose Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen Jr. v. Cass County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roy David Allen Jr.
Defendant:
Cass County Detention Center, Linden Police Department, Jose Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cruz-Banegas v. TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01033
Petitioner:
Kenneth Said Cruz-Banegas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. USA
as 1:2022cv00459
Petitioner:
Jaime Cruz Romero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Baeza-Cruz v. Texas Department of Correction
as 9:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jose Baeza-Cruz
Defendant:
Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-X v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
D Feather, FNU Parks, D Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Antonius El-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
