Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00980
Plaintiff:
Intellectual Ventures II LLC
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, GENCO Distribution System, Inc. and others
In Re:
Wm Stephen Boyd
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and Scott Woloson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Walters v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Consol_plaintiff:
Misty Walters
Consol_defendant:
Fedex Ground Package Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephenson Wholesale Company and Richard Person
Thirdparty_defendant:
Stephenson Wholesale Company and Richard Person
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01051
Plaintiff:
Misty Walters
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation , FedEx Express, Inc. , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express, Inc., FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake v. Fedex Ground Package
as 2:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BarTex Research LLC v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 6:2007cv00385
Plaintiff:
BarTex Research LLC, BarTex Research LLC, BarTex Research LLC and others
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Branch v. Fedex Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv00356
Plaintiff:
Ronda Branch
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
