Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Bonin v. Chandler et al
as 1:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
Perry Bonin
Defendant:
Ace Chandler and Michael Manuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Orr v. Bray et al
as 4:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
Melvin Wayne Orr
Defendant:
Jenan Bray, Lisa Chandler, Greg Basham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera v. Michael Unit UCC/ASC et al
as 6:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Richard Herrera
Defendant:
Michael Unit UCC/ASC, Huntsville State Classification Director and John Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Achusi et al v. Diversicare Leasing Corp. et al
as 4:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
Okwi Achusi , Yvonne Adams-Sales , Beatrice Adebayo and others
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp. , Diversicare Management Services Co. , Advocat Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Arsenal Minerals and Royalty et al v. The City of Denton, TX
as 4:2014cv00639
Plaintiff:
Arsenal Minerals and Royalty , Chandler Davis Trust The, Leslee Ann Gassaway Davis and others
Defendant:
Denton Texas City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chandler v. USA
as 4:2013cv00593
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Wade Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chalaris v. Chandler et al
as 4:2013cv00241
Plaintiff:
John Chalaris
Defendant:
Rochelle Chandler and Chandler & Knowles CPAs PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Chandler v The Kroger Co
as 2:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Chandler
Defendant:
The Kroger Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kilgore v. Kirby et al
as 6:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
Micah Ray Kilgore
Defendant:
Andrew H Kirby, Jennifer A Chandler, Mathew R Carmichael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
as 1:2011cv00398
Plaintiff:
Carleton Adams , Gloria Jean Adams , Nelda Adams and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
