Cases 21 - 30 of 182
Bunn v. Lane
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bunn
Respondent:
FNU Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Texas Instruments, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Texas Instruments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 9:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denby v. Collier - TDCJ Director et al
as 6:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
FNU Garcia, FNU Delapp, FNU Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Unitech America, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Unitech America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lane v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Lane
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Coats et al v. Mies & Sons Trucking, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lane Coats and Roberta Gaynelle Hill
Defendant:
Mies & Sons Trucking, LLC and Carl J. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Beusch et al
as 6:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Beusch, Unknown Boykin, Unknown Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
