Cases 31 - 40 of 1,226
Doe (M.K.) v. G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (M.K.)
Defendant:
G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, G6 Hospitality IP, LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC v. Does 1-601
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-601
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fregia v. Warden Marshall, et al.
as 6:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Defendant:
Sgt. John Doe, Warden Unknown Marshall, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Petitioner:
John W. Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU LNU, FNU Rodwag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sheriff Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, FNU Arrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe and Table Company in TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
