Cases 51 - 60 of 1,667
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Geiger v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Michael E. Geiger
Defendant:
Laura Haney and Bobby Lumpkin
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Early et al v. Union Security Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
E Dale Early and Joan Early
Defendant:
Union Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lander v. Odom et al
as 4:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Peter E. Lander
Defendant:
Stephen W. Odem, Jr., The Impact Partnership LLC, Matt Dorminey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Comparan v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Carlo Ramon Comparan
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Jonathan Clark, Michael A Collum and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butcher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Charles I. Butler and Charles E. Butcher, II
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
