Cases 61 - 70 of 184
Peters v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board, State of Texas, Barbara Gladden Adamick and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mancill et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv00305
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group Inc
Plaintiff:
Peter Mancill and Deborah Mancill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas Pellets, Inc. et al v. German Pellets GmbH et al
as 2:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
Texas Pellets, Inc. and German Pellets Texas, LLC
Defendant:
German Pellets GmbH, IPBG Pellets Beteiligungs GmbH, Peter Leibold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ware v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ulysses T Ware
Defendant:
Kim Jones, Wanda Jones, Joe White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2018cv00087
Petitioner:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2018cv00029
Petitioner:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Deborah G Cockrell, Thomas R Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orazi v. Panasenko et al
as 1:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Ryan Orazi
Defendant:
Peter Panasenko , GTY Services, LLC and Cresco Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bables v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00648
Plaintiff:
Peter Bables
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green Ice Technology, LLC v Ice Cold 2, LLC
as 4:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
Green Ice Technology
Defendant:
Ice Cold 2, LLC, EcoCool Technologies, LLC, EcoCool Technologies Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
