Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Beaty v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Mary Lynn Beaty
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Santellana v. Beaty et al
as 6:2020cv00553
Defendant:
Arnold Canul, Bryan Negrini and Mathew Beaty
Plaintiff:
Thomas Santellana, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaty et al v. Gulf Stream Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Beaty and Mark Beaty
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beaty v. Director
as 5:2020cv00004
Petitioner:
Joseph Glenn Beaty
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greenough v. Fletcher et al
as 6:2019cv00382
Defendant:
District Attorney Jim Wheeler, Judge Jeff Fletcher and Trial Counsel Ted Beaty
Plaintiff:
Randall Greenough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cupit v. Texas Civil Commitment Office
as 1:2017cv00314
Petitioner:
Beatis D Cupit
Respondent:
Texas Civil Commitment Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Achusi et al v. Diversicare Leasing Corp. et al
as 4:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
Okwi Achusi , Yvonne Adams-Sales , Beatrice Adebayo and others
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp. , Diversicare Management Services Co. , Advocat Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Beaty v. Daniels et al
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
Duane E Beaty
Defendant:
Charles. Daniels, UP Fox, UP Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cloeren Incorporated et al v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv00651
Plaintiff:
Cloeren Incorporated, Cloeren Industries, LLC and Canberra, LLC
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company and Randy Jarrell d/b/a Beaty Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
