Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Gomez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Santos Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Gomez v. RXO, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Corinna Gomez
Defendant:
RXO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
v. Gomez
as 4:2023cv00779
Defendant:
Corinna Gomez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Quinn v. Edo's Trucking Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Shawn Quinn
Defendant:
Edo's Trucking Inc. and Kelvyn Gomez De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Puente Curiel v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Raul Curiel and Raul I Puente Curiel
Defendant:
Hector Gomez, Pavon and Busch Truck Auto Sales, LLC and Hector Rafael Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gomez v. Kuku et al
as 6:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Odunay O Kuku, Assistant Warden LaMorris Marshall, Assistant Warden Juan J Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daily v. Lemas et al
as 4:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Royce Glenn Daily
Defendant:
Estela Gomez Lemas and Elbert Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godina-Gomez v. USA
as 4:2022cv00313
Petitioner:
Adan Godina-Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Rossel Abelardo Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramirez et al v. City of Beaumont et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Maria Isabel Ramirez, Amisadai Perez Castellanos, Manuel Ramirez, Sr. and others
Defendant:
City of Beaumont and RCI Hospitality Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
