Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Kolawole S. Bamigboye, Kourtney L. Hadnot, Rockella J. Neal and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Boykin et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Christopher L Norsworthy, Aaron L Thompkins, Bruce H Fredrick and others
Plaintiff:
Latthen Chance Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Harris
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Antoine Mario Thomas
Defendant:
R Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
John H Ward , Johnny R Harris and Harris Brooks
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
