Cases 1 - 10 of 306
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Unknown Officers
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, FNU Sowell, FNU Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Vashon Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BEPS SERVICES, LLC v. BLUE ESCAPE POOLS LLC, ET AL.
as 4:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
BEPS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BLUE ESCAPES POOL & SPA
Defendant:
BLUE ESCAPE POOLS LLC and ROGER DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hafner v. DeLaura et al
as 6:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Hafner
Defendant:
Unknown DeLaura, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Murdock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Winebrenner
as 9:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Terrell Justin Rogers
Defendant:
Rhonda Michele Winebrenner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. State Farm
as 6:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Shirley E Rogers
Defendant:
State Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rogers v. USA
as 9:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Terrell Justin Rogers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
