Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C.
as 2:2024mc00005
Petitioner:
Tyson Foods Inc
Respondent:
Pardalis Technology Licensing, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 601 Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 601 Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Smith v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tommy Brown, Felicia Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BURRIS v. TYSON FOODS, INC. et al
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
SHANE BURRIS
Defendant:
TYSON FOODS, INC. and AMIR ATA JABARZADEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Keeler et al v. Tyson Foods Inc
as 4:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
samuell keeler and luke gossett
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rios v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 9:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Brenda Rios
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
John Soules Foods, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
John Soules Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
