Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Phillips & Jordan, Inc. v. Whitlock Air Service, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Phillips & Jordan, Inc.
Defendant:
Whitlock Air Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Whitlock et al v. SNL Distribution Services Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00853
Plaintiff:
Orville David Whitlock and Carla Whitlock
Defendant:
SNL Distribution Services Corporation and John Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pantech Design, LLC v. Audio Fidelity Communications Corporation d/b/a The Whitlock Group
as 4:2015cv00131
Defendant:
Audio Fidelity Communications Corporation d/b/a The Whitlock Group
Plaintiff:
Pantech Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Whitlock v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2015cv00015
Petitioner:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Respondent:
Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitlock v. Merchant et al
as 5:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Defendant:
Dawn Merchant, Tori Scott, Reginaldo Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Grayson County et al
as 4:2014cv00551
Plaintiff:
Robert Payne Watson
Defendant:
Grayson County, Jeff Whitmire, David Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Stephens et al
as 5:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Defendant:
William Stephens, Vicki Barrows, Dawn Merchant Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Hudson, Stephen G Rockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 5:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Hudson, Stephen G Rockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. Dir, TDCJ
as 5:2009cv00160
Petitioner:
Tarrance Daron Whitlock
Respondent:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
