Cases 1 - 10 of 303
Johnson v. Sherrill et al
as 7:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
McKenzie H. Sherrill, Bryan D. Reitsma and Kevin B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 7:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
John H. Taylor
Defendant:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director, Kevin Smith, Kareem Hayekco IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Steen et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason Perkins
Defendant:
Daniel Steen, FNU Peyan, Erin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spensley v. USA
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Douglas H Spensley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Matthew Quinton Sanchez
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-035-H
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, Katrina White, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Donnell Eldridge
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, N Martin and H W Pederson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
