Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Wanda Mason, Trey Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Darnell et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edrick Jamar Dunn
Defendant:
Jim Bob Darnell, Barbara Sucsy and Sara L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Darnell et al
as 5:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Edrick Jamar Dunn
Defendant:
Jim Bob Darnell, Barbara Sucsy and Sara L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Edrick Dunn
Defendant:
Sara L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2020cv01943
Defendant:
Wichita County District Attorney, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Sara Waller and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Jesse Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mauldon v. Best et al
as 6:2019cv00066
Petitioner:
Gerrald Wayne Mauldon, Jr
Respondent:
John Best, Sara Reyes and TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rainey v. Thomason et al
as 7:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
William Len Rainey
Defendant:
Russell D Thomason, Sara Adams, Phillip Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey v. Thomason et al
as 1:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
William Len Rainey
Defendant:
Russell D Thomason, Sara Adams, Phillip Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beltran Hernandez v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2017cv00695
Plaintiff:
Sara Esmeralda Beltran Hernandez
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , John Kelly , Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
