Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Gill v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00033
Petitioner: Larry Gill
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boatwright v. Sadberry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00182
Defendant: Michael Harvey, Dallas Police Department, Parkland and others
Plaintiff: Shannon Brianna Boatwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gill v. Alexander et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00115
Respondent: Kailey Smiles, Ms. FNU Murrack, Robert D Coffey and others
Plaintiff: Rudolfo Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gills v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 3:2019cv02121
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation
Plaintiff: Cheryl Gills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2019cv00101
Petitioner: Rudolfo Gill
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00114
Petitioner: Rudolfo Gill
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coomer v. Roth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00121
Petitioner: Tracey Harris Coomer
Respondent: Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01100
Plaintiff: Emma Jean Gill
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. Muhammad-Bey et al
as 5:2018cv00030
Plaintiff: DeAndre Gill
Defendant: Iman Muhammad-Bey, F. Kynard, K. Pinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02600
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?