Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Johnson v. Toribio et al
as 2:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
R Toribio, R Phillips and J Windham
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Par Mineral Corporation v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Co., L.P., L.L.L.P et al
as 5:2008cv00229
Plaintiff:
Par Mineral Corporation
Defendant:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Co., L.P., L.L.L.P, Kenneth Allen, Johnny Page and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv01685
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Miller et al
as 2:2007cv00192
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
J Miller, Kelly Ward, NFN Galbreaith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Grimes et al
as 2:2007cv00191
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Joe Grimes, NFN Rowlands, P Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Judd et al
as 2:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
NFN Judd, M Maes, B Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 2:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
NFN Davis, J Allen, NFN Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Windham et al
as 2:2007cv00194
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
J Windham, NFN R.C., P Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 2:2007cv00117
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 2:2007cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
