Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Marlett et al v. Heath et al
as 3:2018cv02812
Defendant:
David Kilgore, Elizabeth Chavez, 3 Unknown Child Support Representatives or Supervisors and others
Interested Party:
Jack Herod Trucking
Plaintiff:
EEM, TWM, Robert Marlett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McPhaul v. City of Frisco et al
as 3:2018cv01642
Plaintiff:
Christopher McPhaul
Defendant:
City of Frisco, Jason Kimbrough, Lauren Sralla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Rodriquez v. Heath Consultants Incorporated
as 3:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Marcie Rodriquez
Defendant:
Heath Consultants Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Samples v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Samples
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Heath Hodge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards v. Stewart et al
as 5:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
Duane Heath Richards
Defendant:
Rusty Stewart and Christian Pina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv02556
Plaintiff:
Raymond Scott , Nathan Kleeb , Gabriella Earle and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd GP LLC and M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baxter et al v. Greenlaw et al
as 3:2017cv02433
Plaintiff:
Adam Baxter and David Ostlund
Defendant:
Hollis M Greenlaw, Philip K Marshall, J Heath Malone and others
Movant:
Richard Evans
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Archuleta v. Edwards et al
as 5:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Archuleta
Defendant:
Heath Edwards, Leo Abiles, Richard Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2017cv02212
Plaintiff:
Sharon Heath and Henry Heath
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
