Cases 41 - 50 of 1,058
Caldwell et al v. Duncanville Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE CALDWELL, LARRY MICHAEL HOOK and AJUA YVETTE MASON
Defendant:
Duncanville Police Department, SERGEANT D. YOUNTS, OFFICER PINEDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. U.S. Federal Judges
as 3:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Manning
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Kaufman Constables Office et al
as 3:2023cv02064
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Manning
Defendant:
Kaufman Constables Office, Calloway County Sheriff's Office, Medical City Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bibbs v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Bibbs
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacob White
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beckstrand v. Beckstrand et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Kevin Beckstrand
Defendant:
Erin Beckstrand, Lloyd Whelchel and Richard J. Corbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01868
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Mr D Skeggs, Mr M Gruver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01731
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
M Gruver and J Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
