Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Day v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00514
Plaintiff:
Trellis Kyle Day
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Day v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00364
Plaintiff:
Rodger D Day
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Days v. Brannon et al
as 3:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Frank Days
Defendant:
Deanna Brannon, William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID, Dawn Call and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Davis
as 4:2016cv01161
Petitioner:
Daniel Patrick Day
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin et al v. Able Supply Company et al
as 3:2016cv03313
Plaintiff:
William Raymond Griffin, Jr and Lindola M Griffin
Defendant:
Able Supply Company , A P Supply Company , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Day & Zimmermann Incorporated
Cross_defendant:
Able Supply Company , CBS Corporation , Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Day v. USA
as 3:2016cv03243
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wayne Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Day v. USA
as 3:2016cv01888
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Day v. Kroger Texas L.P.
as 3:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Laquita R Day
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
