Cases 51 - 60 of 179
Doe v. RBHFO Midtown LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01321
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
RBHFO Texas Student Housing, LLC, Statewide Patrol Incorporated, RBHFO Student Housing, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Real Property Known as 222 Deerfield Lane Connellsville, Pennsylvania
as 3:2020cv00729
Defendant:
Real Property Known as 222 Deerfield Lane Connellsville, Pennsylvania
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hankins v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Plaintiff:
Lori Lanee Hankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01838
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lane v. The United States
as 3:2019cv01492
Plaintiff:
Brian Lane
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harcos Chemicals Inc v. Stokes et al
as 3:2019cv00894
Plaintiff:
Harcos Chemicals Inc
Defendant:
Patricia Wertenberger, Paige Megan Stokes and Landon Lane Stokes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sutherland v. Akins et al
as 4:2019cv00216
Defendant:
Officer Gay, Rick Denney, Monica Daughtery and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DMG PrimeMyBody.com LLC v. Moerke et al
as 3:2019cv00569
Defendant:
Lane Dorsey and Jeffrey Moerke
Plaintiff:
DMG PrimeMyBody.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
