Cases 51 - 60 of 186
Nelms v. The Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 3:2018cv00302
Petitioner:
Brandon Dale Nelms
Respondent:
The Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whaley v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas et al
as 3:2018cv00144
Petitioner:
Michael Dewayne Whaley
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Texas Department of Pardons & Paroles, Judge of 282nd Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tate v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
as 3:2018cv00145
Petitioner:
Freddie Tate
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swanson v. Board of Pardons and Parole Officials
as 3:2018cv00072
Petitioner:
Antoine Swanson
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Parole Officials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franco v. TDCJ Pardons & Parole
as 5:2017cv00297
Petitioner:
Jeff Jason Franco
Respondent:
TDCJ Pardons & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lampkin v. The State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 2:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
The State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerda, Jr. v. Horsley et al
as 5:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Arturo Luna Cerda, Jr.
Respondent:
FNU Horsley and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv01973
Plaintiff:
Ivery T William
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole and Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiff v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
as 3:2017cv01615
Petitioner:
Devon Stiff
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Padilla v. Griffins et al
as 3:2017cv01426
Plaintiff:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Defendant:
Wesley Griffins, Arthur Maghalu, Texas Director of Texas Prison System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
