Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Blanks v. Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville et al
as 3:2023cv02438
Plaintiff:
Jerris M Blanks
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville, Bureau of Prisons and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. TCFL Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Barret Davis and Jon Culver
Defendant:
Crystal Blank, Samuel Blank, M&M Sales, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Blank v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00932
Special Master:
Special Master
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does 1 through 20, Inclusive, DePuy Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lonny S Blank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanks v. USA
as 4:2020cv01066
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Keon Blanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blanks v. Department of Aging and Disability
as 4:2020cv00115
Plaintiff:
Lisa Blanks
Defendant:
Department of Aging and Disability
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blank v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv00096
Defendant:
Charles Eilert, Aminia Baruti and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Travis Blank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Blank v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00577
Defendant:
D.O. Charles Eilert, M.D. Aminia Baruti and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Travis Blank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Blank
as 3:2019cv01715
Defendant:
Paul Casey Blank
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blanks v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
Keon Blanks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blanks v. Crimstone AAA Operating Company LLP et al
as 3:2017cv03255
Plaintiff:
Chakari Blanks
Defendant:
Crimstone AAA Operating Company LLP and Pallet Logistics of America LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
