Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Craven v. USA
as 2:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
Lindsay Craven
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lane et al v. Conestoga Settlement Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Jackson, Deatra Lane, Eberle Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Conestoga Trust Services LLC, LL Bradford and Company LLC, James Settlement Services, LLC and others
Drake et al v. John Doe Trucking Company et al
as 3:2020cv03189
Plaintiff:
EV Drake, Eric Drake, E V Drake and others
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Sidney Fitzwater, Charles Noteboom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong et al v. Kimberly Clark Corporation
as 3:2020cv03150
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Melissa Armstrong, Roland Nadeau, Sandra Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Crawford v. Chief Lee Pitts et al
as 4:2020cv01119
Defendant:
Sgt. W. Wedel, Officer Richard Huitt, Deputy Ralph Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Craven v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv02071
Defendant:
Bill Fraser and Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Plaintiff:
Kyle Craven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Craven v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Craven
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Craven v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00008
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Craven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
