Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Goad v. Lackey et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Defendant:
CL Specialty Construction LLC, Andrew Cody Lackey and Cody Lackey
Plaintiff:
David Patrick Goad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wells v. LTC Delivery LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02384
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wells
Defendant:
LTC Delivery LLC, Laura Goad, Mark Goad and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Goad et al v. Lyde et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Lozada et al
as 5:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant:
Andrea Lozada, David Reed, Jr., Ricardo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silvas v. Collier - TDCJ Director et al
as 5:2021cv00113
Defendant:
Andrew Baker, Amber Hansen, Nell Gaithers and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Silvas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preferred Contractors Ins Co LLC v. Spears Construction Management LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00792
Defendant:
Bobby Spears, Shelly Goad, Spears Construction Management LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv03851
Plaintiff:
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of State, John Kerry and others
Petitioner:
David Goad
Amicus Curiae:
Rev. Tommy Williams, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Davis v. Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas et al
as 4:2014cv00957
Plaintiff:
Torrance Davis
Defendant:
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas and Nigel Goad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
