Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Anderson v. Stevens Transport Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Richard Anderson
Defendant:
Stevens Transport, Inc., Drequan Grant and Aaron McArthur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Grant v. Binkley
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Thomas Grant
Defendant:
Ryan Binkley
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Grant-Guye v. Walmart Inc
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Lesa R Grant-Guye
Defendant:
Walmart Inc doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter #1178, Walmart Supercenter #1178 and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter #1178
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Grant v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ahmad Grant
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
John v. Grant
as 3:2024cv00957
Petitioner:
Robert Charles John
Respondent:
NFN Grant, Warden and Dr S Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Grant v. United States of America
as 3:2024xc00794
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Grant
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC v. Dondero et al
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC
Defendant:
James Dondero, Mark Okada, Mark Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harris v. Grant
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Harris
Defendant:
Keith Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hill v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gregg Hill
Defendant:
Edgardo Garcia, Jose Hernandez, James Kepaeltas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
