Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff: John Gabriel Rios
Defendant: Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00292
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Hill v. Seng
as 3:2020cv01642
Defendant: Sergeant K. Seng and K Seng
Plaintiff: Michael Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00948
Petitioner: Ronald Michael Hill
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saldana v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv00241
Plaintiff: Federico Flores Saldana, Jr
Defendant: E. C. Williams, Wade T Alexander, Jason Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00869
Petitioner: Ronald Michael Hill
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02011
Plaintiff: Michael Hill
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , Depuy Products, Inc. and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00228
Petitioner: Ronald Michael Hill
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00522
Petitioner: Ronald Michael Hill
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?