Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Encompass Independent Insurance Company v. Parham et al
as 3:2024cv01848
Defendant:
Manuel Sanchez and Kelsi Shae Parham
Plaintiff:
Encompass Independent Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Parham v. Wayne McCollum Detention Center et al
as 3:2022cv02790
Plaintiff:
Robert Parham
Defendant:
Wayne McCollum Detention Center and NFN Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Brooks et al
as 5:2019cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael Denard Whitfield
Defendant:
Lt. NFN Parhams and Officer NFN Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parham et al v. City of Burkburnett et al
as 7:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Shelly D Parham and Victor Hines, III
Defendant:
City of Burkburnett and Daniel C Elbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Garcia v. Stevens et al
as 2:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Daniel Garcia
Defendant:
Albert A Stevens, Jayson L Hendrix, Norris B Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham v. Ryder System Inc
as 3:2013cv00923
Defendant:
Ryder System Inc
Plaintiff:
Ronald Parham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Parham et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics et al
as 3:2011cv02969
Plaintiff:
Clara R Parham and Joseph R Parham, Sr
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baumer et al v. Satu et al
as 4:2011cv00607
Plaintiff:
Nathan Baumer and Joane Baumer
Defendant:
Amouzou Satu, Timothy Bryson, MSA, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
