Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Joe v. Stickney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02374
Petitioner: Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant: Paul D Stickney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe v. Price et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01831
Plaintiff: Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant: John Wiley Price, Paul D Stickney, Dallas County Inc Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe v. Stickney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00421
Plaintiff: Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant: Paul D Stickney and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaney v. Fish et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00907
Plaintiff: Jerry Blaney
Defendant: A Joe Fish, Sidney A Fitzwater, Paul D Stickney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01906
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00530
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doe v. Brender et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00325
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Arthur Brender, Karen Coomer Denney, Melissa Madeline Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Brender et al
as 4:2010cv00093
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Arthur Brender, Karen Coomer Denney, Melissa Madeline Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hughes v. Lynn et al
as 3:2009cv00480
Defendant: Barbara M G Lynn and Paul D Stickney
Plaintiff: Michael Anthony Hughes
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?