Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Pena v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Kourtney Pena
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pena-Talamantes v. USA
as 4:2024cv00269
Petitioner:
Pedro Pena-Talamantes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Campbell v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas et al
as 3:2023cv02232
Plaintiff:
Twann Campbell
Defendant:
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas d/b/a Methodist Health System, Officer Martinez, City of Cedar Hill, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Knight v. Pena et al
as 3:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Joshua Knight
Defendant:
Mary Pena, Tony Brit and James Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Montford Unit et al
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Oscar N. Garcia
Defendant:
Montford Unit, David Reed, Chantal A. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. One Gods Way Media LLC
as 3:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Albert Pena
Defendant:
One God's Way Media LLC and One Gods Way Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Pena v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00636
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Pena
Respondent:
United States of America and F.J. Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Castro v. Trump et al
as 4:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Charles Rettig, Maria Chapa Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
