Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Viera et al v. Hudman et al
as 3:2022cv00386
Petitioner:
Patrice Viera, Kevin Henry and Brittany Darbonne
Respondent:
Joyce Hudman, Matt Sebesta, Jr., Dude Payne and others
Defendant:
Stacy Adams and Donald Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Yasin v. Adams
as 4:2022cv03491
Plaintiff:
Sharon Yasin
Defendant:
Wanda Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. The City of Taft et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Marcus E Adams
Defendant:
The City of Taft, Joe Sandoval and Melissa Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lewis et al v. Rosenberg Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv02593
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis and Regina Armstead
Defendant:
Rosenberg Police Department, City of Rosenberg, John Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. City of Mont Belvieu et al
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thompson
Defendant:
City of Mont Belvieu, Texas, Adam Artimez, Slade Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Adams v. Mustang Security
as 4:2021cv03080
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Adams
Defendant:
Mustang Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Martinez v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
George Martinez
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, Well Path, L.L.C., Fernando Carreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00692
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
