Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Norred v. TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Norred
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Byrd Unit, UTMB Correctional Division, Dr. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Ridgley v. Currie
as 4:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ridgley
Defendant:
Tammy Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Montford Unit
as 4:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Tony Curry
Defendant:
Montford Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Curry et al
as 4:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph M Curry, Amanda J. Gregory, Susan Boedeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Mark Robertson, George Curry, Tony Egbuna Ford and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv01075
Defendant:
Zavien Gartica, Rocky Moore, Amankwu and others
Plaintiff:
Demetric Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis, Lieutenant Ahmed Aboulmalik, Sargeant Robert Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Hicks, Don Overton, Eddie Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lathon v. Curry et al
as 4:2018cv01801
Plaintiff:
Travis Lathon
Defendant:
C.D. Curry, R.C. Ware and Houston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Holcomb et al
as 4:2016cv02931
Plaintiff:
Chico Nakia Curry
Defendant:
J. Holcomb and Jamarcus Goodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
