Cases 91 - 100 of 113
Ramos et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 7:2010cv00361
Plaintiff:
Benito Ramos and Delia Ramos
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's and Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 17.924 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, et al
as 1:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
17.924 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, Cameron County Irrigation District No. 2, Rudy Cavazos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Leo v. City of Alice, Texas et al
as 2:2010cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kara Leo
Defendant:
City of Alice, Texas and Benito Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Electric Gin Company of San Benito et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Electric Gin Company of San Benito and L&W Limited Partnership
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Gomez-Perez v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00080
Petitioner:
Benito Gomez-Perez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 7:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joe Hernandez
Defendant:
City of San Benito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. City of San Benito
as 1:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joe Hernandez
Defendant:
City of San Benito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Guerra et al
as 4:2010cv01459
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Benito Guerra and Maria Julieta Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
Gonzalez et al v. Perez et al
as 7:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Benito Gonzalez and Alma Rodriguez
Defendant:
Manuel Noel Perez, Jr. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
