Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Calhoun v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al
as 2:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Tanya Lawson, Mrs. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holman v. Fairchild et al
as 4:2017cv01745
Plaintiff:
Sheketha Holman
Defendant:
Leland A. Fairchild, Dinnie R. Calhoun, Rawltyn Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALHOUN v. TIDY INVESTMENT LP II et al
as 4:2017cv01355
Plaintiff:
DWAYLON CALHOUN
Defendant:
TIDY INVESTMENT LP II and INTERSTATE HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Flynn et al
as 4:2017mc00986
Plaintiff:
Sam Calhoun
Defendant:
John Flynn and Scott B. Mc Clelland
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Calhoun v. Villa et al
as 4:2016cv03001
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Oshea Calhoun
Defendant:
Tony Villa, G D Rogers, Z. J. Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvan v. Calhoun County et al
as 3:2015cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jose Galvan
Defendant:
Calhoun County , George Aleman , Phoenix Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galvan v. Calhoun County et al
as 6:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jose Galvan
Defendant:
Calhoun County , George Aleman , Phoenix Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Dunn et al v. Catoe et al
as 4:2015cv02269
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Dunn, Khaliq Mehmood and Robin L. Jackson
Defendant:
Jefferey Catoe, Stuart Calhoun, John Becraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CCH Investments, LLC et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv01852
Plaintiff:
CCH Investments, LLC and Nancy Carolyn Calhoun Huckabay
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation , Chesapeake Operating Inc , Chesapeake Operating LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
