Cases 11 - 20 of 216
George et al v. Abbott et al
as 4:2023cv03609
Plaintiff:
Darresha George, Darryl George and Darresha G.
Defendant:
Justice Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Barbers Hill Independant School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03163
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Kelly Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hendrix v. Clark et al
as 4:2023cv03316
Plaintiff:
Jennifer K. Hendrix
Defendant:
Clayton Clark, Scott Love, Shelley Hutson and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02805
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv02769
Plaintiff:
Shannon Murphy
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02888
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
