Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Bazile v. Paxton et al
as 4:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jarred Gerard Bazile
Defendant:
Hon. Ken Paxton, Hon. Bryan Collier, Hon. Patrick L. O'Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Leachman v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2022cv04329
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Leachman
Defendant:
David Gutierrez and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv03523
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Wayne Mack
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Ken Paxton and Nathan Tadema
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rosenthal et al
as 4:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Lee H Rosenthal, District Judge Keith P Ellison, US District Judge Lynn N Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kemp v. Paxton
as 4:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Edward Kemp
Defendant:
TX Attorney General Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Paxton et al
as 4:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Gregg Abbott and Rick Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters et al v. Texas Child Support Office et al
as 4:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters and Dalton G Peters
Defendant:
Texas Child Support Office, Ken Paxton and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkeen v. Paxton
as 4:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Dell Everette Burkeen, II
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkeen v. Paxton
as 4:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Dell Burkeen, II
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
