Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Berkeley HeartLab, Inc. v. Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. et al
as 4:2011mc00400
Plaintiff: Berkeley HeartLab, Inc.
Defendant: Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc., F. Calhoun Dent, G. Russell Warnick and others
Movant: Cammie Nguyen
Guillen v. Lyssy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00048
Plaintiff: Amanda Guillen
Defendant: Vern Lyssy and Calhoun County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00398
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Calhoun v. Schindler Elevator Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv03997
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation
Plaintiff: Elsie Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoun et al v. Nationwide Property And Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv03480
Plaintiff: Oliver Calhoun and Janice Calhoun
Defendant: Nationwide Property And Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Rogers et al v. Houston Independent School District et al
as 4:2010cv00658
Plaintiff: Dykeba Lecole Rogers and Floyd Thomas Rogers, Sr
Defendant: Houston Independant School District , Abe Saavedra, Terry Grier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00017
Petitioner: Thomas J Calhoun
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv02761
Petitioner: Dedrick Calhoun
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv02457
Petitioner: Dedrick Calhoun
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?