Cases 41 - 50 of 1,265
Jones v. Warden Strong et al
as 4:2023cv04471
Plaintiff:
Sean D Jones
Defendant:
Warden Strong, Suzzane V. Temorio, Victoria C. Dorimics and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2023cv04219
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Boyd Unit and Major Skeggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv04053
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Summerville v. Edward Jones & Company
as 4:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Yuliery Summerville
Defendant:
Edward Jones & Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Diogu et al v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv03959
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
dft David Jones, Eduardo V. Rodriguez, T. Michael O'Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Deelen v. Jones
as 4:2023cv03729
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Van Deelen
Defendant:
David R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03742
Petitioner:
Rodolfo King Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. The United States of America
as 4:2023cv03655
Petitioner:
Christopher Jones
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
