Cases 61 - 70 of 1,277
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00233
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sands, D.P.M. v. Protective Life Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv02620
Plaintiff:
Mark Sands, D.P.M. and Marks Sands
Defendant:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Hajda et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv02475
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Hajda and Sheryl Hajda
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Gilbert v. Stephenson et al
as 3:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gilbert
Defendant:
Dr. Kelly W. Stephenson, Dr. Mark A. Foreman, Dr. Rishi Rajiv Lall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sagstetter v. Phifer et al
as 4:2023cv02544
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sagstetter
Defendant:
Mark Richard Phifer and Broken Arrow Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Politte v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv02535
Petitioner:
Daniel Mark Politte
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Ponce et al
as 4:2023cv02709
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Guadalupe F Ponce, Pablo Picado, Brandon McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
